Foreign Entities Control Idaho Elections

In this article we will explain how computerized election fraud is being carried out in Idaho, and show that the software that manages Idaho elections is controlled by foreign corporations. We hope that this information will help spur Idaho politicians to acknowledge the problems and to take immediate measures to remove the threat of computerized election fraud in Idaho.

Unfortunately, most Idaho’s political leaders refuse to face up to the reality of machine fraud, and offer false reassurances to Idaho voters instead of effective reforms. In spite of overwhelming evidence of systematic computerized fraud, Republican leaders accept any other excuse for MAGA losses in solid red districts, to avoid addressing e-fraud. Both RINO and MAGA wings of the Republican party, are complicit, so the very people that conservatives depend on to fight for fair elections, are enabling election fraud instead of opposing it.

And Idaho Political Leaders are Ignoring the Problem

But this needs to change. It is becoming increasingly clear that Trump has the evidence he needs to move against election fraudsters and at some point, those who have been stealing elections, and keeping cities, counties, school boards and state offices perpetually under establishment control, will no longer be able to maintain their power by fraud.

And its not only the fraudsters who need to be held accountable. All political leaders who have refused to acknowledge machine fraud, and done nothing in spite of overwhelming evidence of stolen elections, are complicit.

Before exposing the Election Technology companies that appear to be complicit in stealing Idaho's elections, let's review of the evidence of computerized fraud in Idaho, and how we know that the Election Management software running in the Secretary of State's office is almost certainly corrupt.

There have been many suspicious RINO victories in deep red North Idaho for many years, but not until the 2024 NIC Trustee election, did we find overwhelming, undeniable proof of machine fraud. We reported the problems to the appropriate authorities (County Clerk, BOCC, KCRCC) , before the election was certified, but they refused to investigate. Nevertheless we continued to expose the vulnerabilities of electronic tabulators, which we suspected were the main problem.

But many questions remained. How were tabulators being programmed to cheat and by whom? And how could multiple tabulators be programmed to work in unison, to produce a pre-determined result? And what about Dr. Frank’s analysis of Idaho’s 2020 election? His research proved that both the number of registered voters and the number of ballots cast in every county in Idaho was determined by a mathematical formula based on the 2010 census. This could only be possible if Idaho elections were being manipulated by software running at the state level.

Tabulators can flip votes and falsify ballot images, but they cannot change the number of registered voters, or pollbook data. So we began to look at the software running in the Secretary of State’s office that handled online registration, electronic pollbooks, and election night reporting, and found that all were associated with Tenex Election Desk, an integrated Election Management program that has controlled Idaho elections since 2018.

Election Fraud Orchestrated at the State Level

What we Learned About Tenex Election Software

In a previous article (Idaho's Phantom Election Management Software), we looked at problems with the Tenex program in detail. The Tenex Election Desk program integrates many different election management tools into a single platform, which is, of course, very convenient for both election officials, and also for fraudsters who have illicit access.

Tenex is a sophisticated program that handles many critical election-related tasks, many of which were formerly handled by county clerks, so that no single program could access all of Idaho's election data statewide. Now Tenex Software has access to everything. It manages:

• online registration and voter list maintenance,

• electronic poll books,

• election night reporting,

• absentee ballot management and signature verification,

• help desk and voter information lookup,

• asset management and inventory tracking,

• records archive and management

• poll-worker management and training, and

• campaign finance reporting.

The article listed above includes more details about the Tenex platform and the company behind it. It even discusses some of Tenex's competitors. And one of the articles most important conclusions was that given the number of employees (~70), it seems that Tenex is far too small to have developed such a sophisticated platform. The same is true of most of its competitors.

We concluded that Tenex was almost certainly licensing its software from some other, larger Election Technology Company. At the time we wrote the article, we did not have enough evidence to identify that company. Now we know with a high degree of certainty, that the company that wrote most of Tenex's election management software is Scytl, a foreign company based in Barcelona, Spain.

"Scytl is the global leader in secure election management, electronic voting and e-Governance solutions. Specializing in election modernization technologies, Scytl offers the first end-to-end election management and voting platform, providing the highest security and transparency standards currently available. Scytl has capitalized on its more than 18 years of research to develop election-specific cryptographic security technology protected by more than 40 international patents and patent applications, positioning Scytl as the company with the largest patent portfolio of the industry."

The above report on Scytl is from a 2015 Berkshire Hathaway newsletter. Since that time Scytl has undergone several changes in ownership and changes of product line. But the state of Scytl technology in 2012-1016 is important, because that is the time it most likely began transfering its software to Tenex and perhaps other American Election Technology companies. The diagram below shows that Scytl's Election products in 2015, were very similar to thosed developed by Tenex a few years later.

Scytl—World Leaders in Election Cryptography

It is significant that Scytl began as a cryptography company, and that it holds dozens of international election cryptography patents, and that it was the first company to develop an "end-to-end" election management platform. What this means is that no other ETC vender could possibly develop a similar set of Election Management tools without Scytl patents. Yet Tenex, and most of Tenex's competitors offer similar set of tools. So what is their relationship to Scytl?

Cryptography has numerous purposes. It can be used to make elections secure, but it can also be used to encrypt information within voter lists and pollbook records in such a way that cheat-software can access all the information it needs from various sources to make fraud appear organic, and to make sure all digital records are in sync.

The achilles heal of ALL proprietary election software is that election records are NEVER safe from "insiders" who know the system's vulnerabilities and hold the encryption keys. And Scytl's "end-to-end" election management platform provides access to everything, and holds the encryption keys to everything. This is why Idaho voters need to know who controls their election mangement software, and who might have access to encryption keys.

Who Controls Scytl?

By figuring out who controls Scytl, we should be able to solve the mystery of who holds the keys to the software that controls Idaho elections. Unfortunately, the trail gets very murky. In 2020 Scytl went through a sudden, “accelerated” bankruptcy and its “productive assets” were liquidated in only six weeks. And the trail got even murkier in 2024, when the UK based holding company that purchased Scytl declared the company insolvent and transferred its remaining assets to a holding company in Buenos Aires.

This is strange behavior for a corporation that 1) was the world leader in electoral cryptography, 2) held over 40 international patents, 3) raised over $100 Million dollars from private investors, 4) had a highly technical, specialized workforce, 5) had customers in over 40 countries and 6) appears to have licensed its software to dozens of election technology companies worldwide.

But there is a plausible explanation (from Google A.I.) “A company that buys the assets of a bankrupt company is typically not liable for the damages or debts incurred by the predecessor company before it declared bankruptcy. . . . this is because assets are sold ‘free and clear’ of most claims and liens.”

In other words, bankuptcy absolves both the old and new owners of damages in case Scytl software is found to be fraudulent, and change of ownership provides plausible deniable for corporate managers. So it appears that the search for financial accountabilitiy deads-end in Spanish bankruptcy courts. But we still need to know who controls Scytl's software.

Another Election Technology company of enormous interest that is located Boca Raton (just an hour's flight from Scytle/SOE), is Smartmatic. Smartmatic is notorious for its association with computerized tabulator fraud and Latin American criminal cartels. This is important because, although Scytl is an international leader in Election Management software, it is not known to be involved in the electronic tabulator market. But Smartmatic is!

So it seems that coordinating Scytl's cryptography protocols and election management tools, with Smartmatic's tabulator software, could provide for a system of fully integrated, computerized election fraud. And since both Scytl and Smartmatic appear to be secretly licensing their software to numerous other vendors, collusion between these companies could involved dozens of election vendors, worldwide.

Why does the close proximity between Tenex, SOE Software (Scytl), and Smartmatic matter? Software collaboration can easily be conducted over the internet. But criminal organizations, secret societies, fraudsters, and especially cryptography experts know that the internet is a non-secure medium of communication. So fraudsters developing secret methods of rigging elections, know that there is no substitute for in-person communication, whenever felonious activities and racketeering are concerned.

Scytl Operations in the U.S.

In 2012, Syctl purchased SOE Software, an ETC based in Tampa, Florida, to give it a foothold in the American market. At the time of purchase, SOE (a.k.a. "Supervisor of Elections") already offered Election Night Reporting (ENR) services, and that is still its primary product.

But curiously, even though Scytl had already developed an integrated suite of election managment tools by 2015, Scytl did not offer them through their SOE subsidiary, and did not openly market their products in the United States. Instead, Scytl appears to have transferred the code for its Election management software to Tenex Sofware Solutions, an ETC currently located just a few miles from Scytle/SOE in Tampa.

It appears as if Scytl's strategy may have been to keep a low profile in the United States, by restricting its SOE subsidiary to Election Night Reporting, while licensing its complete suite of Election Managment tools to Tenex. And it is not unlikely that Scytl has licensing agreements with other vendors since it holds dozens of election-related patents, and several of Tenex's "competitors" have very similar product lines.

If Scytl did silently partner with numerous other American ETC companies, it would create the illusion that the "Election Management" software market was competitive and that states and counties were operating independently, while in reality, most would be running Scytl software. We cannot prove Scytl transfered its technology to other companies besides Tenex, but the close proximity of the two companies, and the timeline by which Tenex's full suite of election managment tools suddenly appeared 2016, provides overwhelming evidence of collaboration.

The Smartmatic Connection

What do the Shriners (all of whom are Master Masons) have to do with Election Fraud? Few people know how influential secret societies have been in American politics throughout its history, and how they have controlled political parties and managed elections since the nation's founding. So it would not be surprising if Masonic networks are behind our whole corrupt, fraudulent system of controlled, scripted, computerized elections.

The cheating itself may be done by computers, but the cover-up, bold-faced lies, false assurances, and refusal to recognize overwhelming proof of fraud, are sure signs of Masonic complicity. Only the existance of secret societies, and a shadow government that controls politicians on all sides of the ideological spectrum can explain the coordinated lies, the universal stonewalling, and the endless betrayals, that Americans have suffered at the hands of their elected leaders. Only secret allegiences and unbreakable oaths can explain the inexplicable denials and unwillingness to address obvious problems among the very politicians who should be most concerned about election fraud.

To be clear, we are not insinuating that every elected official in Idaho is a Mason. That is demonstrably false. But Idaho was founded by Masons; almost all the early government leaders, even during the territorial era had connections with some form of a masonic-linked fraternal organization. Freemasonry is still an active force in Idaho politics, with at least three clubs/lodges just in Kootenai county. And of course, the Mormon Church has long standing ties with Masonry.

So the Masonic influence on Idaho's government has never waned, and Idaho Mason's aren't shy about blasting their symbolism anywhere and everywhere.

Who REALLY Controls Idaho Elections?

We have seen evidence that Scytl and Smartmatic may be colluding on election fraud software, but someone has to determine what elections will be stolen, and make the appropriate arrangements. And this must be done by persons who know the electorate well enough to select which local candidates are a threat, and estimate how many votes will need to be stolen.

We have not yet identified the masterminds, and primary enablers of Election Fraud in Idaho, but we are getting close. To see the organization that is most likely behind election rigging in Idaho, let's zoom in and get a close look at Tenex’s neighbors on Rocky Point Dr. in Tampa. As it turns out, Tenex is just a block away from International Shriners World headquarters. The world Shriners headquarters happens to be in contact with Masonic-linked organizations throughout the United states, and it is unlikely that its close proximity to Election companies, Tenex, SOE, and Scytl is coincidential.

If you do not know what Masonry is, or how the "Ancient and Noble Order of the Mystic Shrine" relates to Masonry, or how Masonry relates to foreign governments and other secret societies, fraternal orders, and civic groups, the NISGR article on Freemasonry and the City of London provides a good introduction.

But in short, all Freemasons are required to 1) keep secrets, 2) protect and promote "brother Masons." Higher order initiates are also inculcated with gnostic ideas that only their anointed, Qualified and Experienced Candidates, have the "wisdom" to rule. It should be obvious how such arrogance and misdirected loyalties could be directed to corrupt politics and control elections.

Nothing could be more expedient than locating the software company that controls Idaho's elections just down the block from an international headquarters of higher order Masonry.

This provides compelling evidence that politically involved fraudsters, not only in Idaho, but throughout the United States communicate with the technical gurus of computerized election fraud by way of Masonic lodges and Shriners clubs. And the more you know about how thoroughly political parties are controlled by Masonic handlers, the more this makes sense.

To explain how corrupted Idaho politics are by Masonic secret socities will require a follow up article, but the information in this article provides legislators with all the information they need to understand that now is the time face up to the reality of Election Fraud in Idaho, and to protect our elections.

There is much more information about Election Fraud in Idaho, including many suggested remedies, on the Eye On Elections Website.